Cases 41 - 50 of 635
HUGHES v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 4:2022cv00165
Plaintiff:
JAMIE ALLYN HUGHES
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2674 Federal Tort Claims Act
Gloria Smith v. USA
as 22-13645
Plaintiff / Appellant:
GLORIA SMITH
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Xiong et al v. United States of America et al
as 6:2022cv01957
Plaintiff:
Choua Xiong and Hope Xiong
Defendant:
United States of America, M.D. Shrimani Reddy and Shrimani Reddy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Breach of Contract
Dayton v. United States of America
as 8:2022cv02366
Plaintiff:
Joseph Richard Dayton
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
John Jones v. USA
as 22-13381
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOHN F. JONES
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Soraliz Cartagena v. Maria Martino-Villanueva, et al
as 22-13322
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SORALIZ CARTAGENA
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, MARIA MARTINO-VILLANUEVA, KRYSTA FEE and others
Not Classified By Court:
SERVICE
Makowski et al v. United States of America et al
as 8:2022cv02243
Plaintiff:
Joseph Makowski and Chanty Makowski
Defendant:
United States of America, Obi Agborbesong, Scott Hewitt and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1402 Medical Malpractice
Caffey v. United States of America et al (MAG+)
as 2:2022cv00542
Plaintiff:
Rodney N. Caffey
Defendant:
Health Services Inc., Shabnam Guard, Publix Supermarkets, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2679 Federal Tort Claim
Collins v. United States of America
as 2:2022cv00550
Plaintiff:
Douglas Eugene Collins
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
Collins v. United States of America
as 2:2022cv00548
Plaintiff:
Douglas Eugene Collins
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
