Cases 11 - 20 of 20
WILDER v. JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. et al
as 1:2018cv20820
Plaintiff:
RICHARD WILDER
Defendant:
JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A., Rodney Rutty, Essex Holdings, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv22605
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Piguet et al v. J.P. Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. et al
as 0:2016cv61935
Plaintiff:
Christine A. Piguet and Peter N. Archer
Defendant:
J.P. Morgan Chase Bank, N.A., J.P. Morgan Chase and Company, Ronald R. Wolfe & Assoc. P.A. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
William Freeman v. JP Morgan Chase Bank N.A.
as 15-14944
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WILLIAM M. FREEMAN
Defendant - Appellee:
JP MORGAN CHASE BANK N.A.
Cornelius v. JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. et al
as 1:2015cv03394
Plaintiff:
Jameel A. Cornelius
Defendant:
JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. , US Bank National Association and McCalla Raymer, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Roberts et al v. JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A.
as 1:2014cv00304
Plaintiff:
Owen Roberts and Wanda Roberts
Defendant:
JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Freeman v. JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A.
as 6:2014cv00121
Plaintiff:
William M. Freeman
Defendant:
JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
James v. U.S. Bank N.A. et al
as 3:2012cv00120
Plaintiff:
Keith James
Defendant:
U.S. Bank N.A., JP Morgan Chase Bank N.A. and McCurdy & Candler, LL
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Alvarado et al v. Pace et al
as 6:2012cv01015
Plaintiff:
Mike Alvarado , Marie Alvarado , Enrique Barba and others
Defendant:
Richard Pace, Scott A. Shaw , Kenneth Franklin, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Womack v. J.P. Morgan Chase Bank, N.A.
as 1:2011cv00927
Plaintiff:
Marsha Womack
Defendant:
J.P. Morgan Chase Bank, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
