Cases 31 - 40 of 46
Pacific Coast Auto Body, Inc. et al v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company et al
as 6:2014cv06010
Plaintiff:
Amato's Auto Body, Inc., Campbell's Auto Body, Inc., Pacific Coast Auto Body, Inc. and others
Defendant:
Mercury Insurance Company, United Financial Casualty Company, Wawanesa General Insurance Company and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0001
McCandliss et al v. Uber Technologies, Inc. et al
as 1:2014cv03275
Plaintiff:
Scott McCandliss , Dmidriy Abramyan , Abdikadir Ahmed and others
Defendant:
Uber Technologies, Inc. , Uber Technologies (GA), Inc., Rasier LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Capitol Body Shop, Inc. et al v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company et al
as 6:2014cv06000
Defendant:
Direct General Insurance Company of Mississippi, Allstate Property and Casualty Company, Progressive Casualty Insurance Company and others
Plaintiff:
Crystal Car Care, Inc., Smith Brothers Collision Center, Inc., Alexander Body Shop, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0001
Omni Healthcare Inc. et al v. Health First, Inc. et al
as 6:2013cv01509
Plaintiff:
Omni Healthcare Inc. , Interventional Spine Institute of Florida , Craig Deligdish and others
Defendant:
Health First, Inc., Holmes Regional Medical Center, Inc., Health First Physicians, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0025
OFFSHORE TUGS CORPORATION v. ST. ANDREWS BAY PILOTS ASSOCIATION, LLC et al
as 3:2012cv00252
Plaintiff:
OFFSHORE TUGS CORPORATION
Defendant:
ST. ANDREWS BAY PILOTS ASSOCIATION, LLC , PANAMA CITY PILOTS, INC. , PANAMA CITY BAR & HARBOR PILOTS ASSOCIATION, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2
In re Florida Cement and Concrete Litigation [Indirect Purchaser Action]
as 1:2009cv23493
Plaintiff:
Philip D. Sanford, Starfish, Inc., Sterling Development Company and others
Consolidated Plaintiff:
Coscan Atlantic 1 LLC
Defendant:
Cemex Corp., Florida Rock Industries, Inc., Holcim (US) Inc. and others
Respondent:
Home Depot U.S.A., Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0025 Clayton Act
Sanford v. Cemex Corp. et al
as 2:2009cv00733
Plaintiff:
Philip D. Sanford
Defendant:
Cemex Corp., Florida Rock Industries, Inc., Holcim (US) Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0025 Clayton Act
In Re Florida Cement and Concrete Antitrust Litigation [Direct Purchaser Action]
as 1:2009cv23187
Plaintiff:
IN re Florida Cement and Concrete Antitrust Litigation, Action Ready Mix Concrete Inc., Superior Concrete and Florida Building Materials, Inc. and others
Consolidated Plaintiff:
Advantage Concrete of Florida, Inc., Puder-Siegel Homes at Mizner Falls, Inc., Home Building Materials, Inc. and others
Defendant:
Cemex Corp., Florida Rock Industries, Inc., Holcim (US) Inc. and others
Consolidated Defendant:
Heidelberg Cement AG, Titan Cement Company S.A., Oldcastle Inc. and others
Consolidated 3Rd Party Plaintiff:
Philip D. Sanford
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0025 Clayton Act
IN RE: Androgel Antitrust Litigation (No. II)
as 1:2009md02084
Plaintiff:
George Steven Legrand, Stephen L. LaFrance Holdings, Inc., Maxi Drug, Inc. doing business as Brooks Pharmacy and others
Counter Defendant:
Meijer Inc and Rochester Drug Co-Operative Inc
In Re:
Androgel Antitrust Litigation (No. II)
Defendant:
Unimed Pharmaceuticals Inc, Perrigo Company, Par Pharmaceuticals Inc and others
Respondent:
King Drug Company of Florence, Inc., Miami-Luken, Inc., Prescription Supply, Inc. and others
Counter Claimant:
Paddock Laboratories Inc
Petitioner:
AmerisourceBergen Corp., McKesson Corp., Besins Healthcare, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Meijer Inc et al v. Unimed Pharmaceuticals Inc et al
as 1:2009cv00958
Counter Defendant:
Meijer Inc
Respondent:
Dik Drug Company, J.M. Smith Corp. d/b/a Smith Drug Company, Miami-Luken, Inc. and others
Petitioner:
Cardinal Health, Inc., AmerisourceBergen Corp., McKesson Corp. and others
Defendant:
Par Pharmaceuticals Inc, Paddock Laboratories Inc, Solvay Pharmaceuticals Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Meijer Distribution Inc
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
