Cases 101 - 110 of 36,695
Philipps v. Thomas Concrete of South Carolina et al
as 4:2024cv00203
Plaintiff:
Michael Albert Philipps
Defendant:
William L. Kidd and Thomas Concrete of South Carolina
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
DANIELY v. DENNY
as 5:2024cv00306
Defendant:
Deputy NICHOLAS DENNY
Plaintiff:
KENDRELL DAIMON DANIELY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
SANDERS v. DAVIS
as 5:2024cv00307
Plaintiff:
OMAR SANDERS
Defendant:
SHERIFF DAVID DAVIS
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
JORDAN v. DENNY et al
as 5:2024cv00308
Defendant:
JOSHUA CRAVEY and OFFICER NICHOLAS DENNY
Plaintiff:
RODDRICK O JORDAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Gilmore v. Dunwoody Police Department et al
as 1:2024cv03092
Defendant:
Micheal Shaw, Dunwoody Police Department and A. Osses
Plaintiff:
Jimmie L. Gilmore, III
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Luo et al v. Patteron et al
as 3:2024cv00128
Defendant:
Richard Woods, Jack Overman, Brian Kemp and others
Plaintiff:
Natalie A., Jennifer A., Mary A. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
JONES v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 3:2024cv00410
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff:
TERESE EBONY JONES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Rukh Khan v. United States of America et al
as 6:2024cv01597
Defendant:
United States of America and Certain Past and Present Special Agents of the Federal Bureau of Investigation
Plaintiff:
Mohammad Shah Rukh Khan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Self v. Bomnin Motors et al
as 1:2024cv23440
Defendant:
Bomnin Motors doing business as Bomnin Chevrolet Dadeland, Bomnin Holdins, LLC, Yanisely Bomnin and others
Plaintiff:
Christopher Beau Self
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 0635 Breach of Insurance Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
