Other Civil Rights Cases filed in the Eleventh Circuit Courts
Cases 21 - 30 of 42
Patterson v. U. S. Department of Health and Human Services
as 1:2015cv01787
Plaintiff: Alexander Patterson, IV
Defendant: U. S. Department of Health and Human Services
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hutchinson Consultants PC, et al v. John or Jane Doe, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 15-11817
Plaintiff - Appellant: HUTCHINSON CONSULTANTS PC and LESLIE HUTCHINSON
Defendant - Appellee: JOHN OR JANE DOE, an employee of FEDERAL OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH, a NON-APPROPRIATED AGENCY WITHIN THE UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, in his or her individual capacity, TISHA MARIE TITUS, M.D. and RICHARD J. MILLER, M.D.
: SERVICE and STG INTERNATIONAL, INC.
Christian and Missionary Allia, et al v. Secretary, Department of Healt
as 15-11635
Plaintiff - Appellant: CHRISTIAN AND MISSIONARY ALLIANCE FOUNDATION, INC., d.b.a. Shell Point Retirement Community, THE ALLIANCE COMMUNITY FOR RETIREMENT LIVING, INC., d.b.a. Chapel Pointe at Carlisle, TOWN AND COUNTRY MANOR OF THE CHRISTIAN AND MISSIONARY ALLIANCE and others
Defendant - Appellee: SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, SECRETARY, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES and others
Christian and Missionary Allia, et al v. Secretary, U.S. Department of, et al
as 15-11437
Plaintiff - Appellee-Cross Appellant: CHRISTIAN AND MISSIONARY ALLIANCE FOUNDATION, INC., d.b.a. Shell Point Retirement Community, SIMPSON UNIVERSITY, THE ALLIANCE COMMUNITY FOR RETIREMENT LIVING, INC. and others
Defendant - Appellant-Cross Appellee: SECRETARY, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, SECRETARY, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, SECRETARY, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY and others
Christian and Missionary Alliance Foundation, Inc. et al v. Burwell et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2014cv00580
Plaintiff: Christian and Missionary Alliance Foundation, Inc. , The Alliance Community For Retirement Living, Inc. , The Alliance Home of Carlisle, Pennsylvania and others
Defendant: Sylvia Mathews Burwell , United States Department of Health and Human Services , Thomas E. Perez and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
FLORES v. HOLDER et al
as 4:2014cv00222
Plaintiff: ERIC FLORES
Defendant: ERIC HOLDER, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES and SIERRA MEDICAL CENTER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2674
The Roman Catholic Archdiocese, et al v. Sec, US Dept HHS, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 14-12890
Plaintiff - Appellee: THE ROMAN CATHOLIC ARCHDIOCESE OF ATLANTA, an association of churches and schools, WILTON D GREGORY, and his successors, Archbishop of the Roman Catholic Archdiocese of Atlanta, CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF THE ARCHDIOCESE OF ATLANTA, INC., a Georgia non-profit corporation and others
Defendant - Appellant: SECRETARY, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF LABOR and others
Eternal Word Television Networ v. U.S. Department of Health and, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 14-12696
Plaintiff - Appellant: ETERNAL WORD TELEVISION NETWORK, INC.
Defendant - Appellee: U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, Secretary, SECRETARY, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF LABOR and others
: SERVICE
Prunty v. Secretary, Department of Health and Human Services
as 1:2014cv20834
Plaintiff: Robert R. Prunty, Jr
Defendant: Secretary, Department of Health and Human Services, Johnson & Johnson Pharmaceuticals, Alex Gorsky and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Franklin v. Farrell et al
as 1:2013cv03950
Plaintiff: Dedrain E. Franklin
Defendant: Dwight Farrell , Fulton County and Fulton County Department of Health and Human Services
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?