Cases 1 - 10 of 20
Duffy v. United States Postal Service et al
as 8:2023cv02891
Plaintiff:
John T. Duffy
Defendant:
US Postal Service, Thomas Magilligan, Robert Carlton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Duffy v. Magilligan et al
as 8:2023cv02604
Plaintiff:
John Duffy
Defendant:
Tom Magilligan, Edward Haab, USPS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Smith-Duffy v. City of Marietta et al
as 1:2022cv03844
Plaintiff:
Taylor Smith-Duffy
Defendant:
City of Marietta, Dan Flynn, Dylan T. Conklin and others
Foreman v. Lamparelli et al
as 0:2022cv61358
Plaintiff:
Kareem Foreman
Defendant:
D. Lamparelli, Patrick O'Brien, V. Guzman and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Foreman v. Lamparelli et al
as 0:2022cv61346
Plaintiff:
Kareem Jabaar Foreman
Defendant:
D. Lamparelli, Patrick O'Brien, V. Guzman and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Uzamere v. Uzamere et al
as 1:2022cv02745
Defendant:
Ehigie Edobor Uzamere, Austin I. Idehen, Esq., Democratic National Committee and others
Plaintiff:
Cheryl D. Uzamere
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Crosby et al v. Austin et al
as 8:2021cv02730
Plaintiff:
Howard Crosby, Gary Bodony, Eric Burgess and others
Defendant:
III Lloyd Austin, Frank Kendall, Karl Schultz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
DAVIS v. CITY OF NEW YORK et al
as 5:2021cv00188
Plaintiff:
WASHINGTON DAVIS
Defendant:
CLEVELAND, GARY SCHMANSKY, GOVERNOR CUOMO and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith-Duffy v. City of Marietta et al
as 1:2021cv01762
Plaintiff:
Taylor Smith-Duffy
Defendant:
Dylan T. Conklin, J. Parker, City of Marietta and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harpo-Brown v. Intermark Management Corporation et al
as 1:2020cv00176
Defendant:
Brookfield Properties, LLC, John De Foor, II, Robert McBurney and others
Plaintiff:
Wihly Harpo-Brown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
