Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Smith v. JP Morgan Bank, NA et al
as 2:2022cv00340
Plaintiff:
Arthur Edward Smith
Defendant:
JP Morgan Bank, NA, JP Morgan Chase & Co. doing business as Chase Bank and Unnamed Chase Bank Associates 1, 2, and 3
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Marlowe v. JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. et al
as 8:2018cv01829
Defendant:
JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. and Bayview Loan Servicing, LLC
Plaintiff:
Sally Marlowe
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Westley v. Alberto et al
as 1:2016cv20283
Plaintiff:
Westley and JOHN D. WESTLEY
Defendant:
Alberto, Thomas Walsh, GLEN RIVERA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Westley v. Alberto et al
as 6:2015cv01948
Plaintiff:
John D. Westley
Defendant:
Jose L. Alberto, RE/MAX, LLC, Verona Condominium Association Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Drakes v. JP Morgan Chase & Co.
as 8:2015cv02226
Plaintiff:
Ambalise Drakes
Defendant:
JP Morgan Chase & Co.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
Costa v. JP Morgan Chase Bank N.A. et al
as 1:2014cv23821
Plaintiff:
Leonardo Costa
Defendant:
JP Morgan Chase Bank N.A. and Roy Hallak
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
WESTLEY v. ALBERTO et al
as 1:2014cv22939
Plaintiff:
JOHN D WESTLEY
Defendant:
JOSE L ALBERTO, RE/MAX LLC, VERONA CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION INC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Mattis v. JP Morgan Chase & Company
as 0:2014cv61782
Plaintiff:
Matrico Mattis
Defendant:
JP Morgan Chase & Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Bodmann et al v. JP Morgan Chase Bank, National Association et al
as 8:2014cv01884
Plaintiff:
James Bodmann and Lucille Bodmann
Defendant:
JP Morgan Chase Bank, National Association, M & T Bank Corporation and Bayview Loan Servicing LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WESTLEY v. ALBERTO et al
as 1:2014cv00109
Plaintiff:
JOHN D WESTLEY
Defendant:
JOSE L ALBERTO, RE/MAX LLC, VERONA CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION INC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
