Motions to Vacate Sentence Cases filed in Alabama
Cases 111 - 120 of 2,502
King v. USA
as 1:2023cv00087
Petitioner: Anthony S. King
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Salter v. USA
as 1:2023cv00080
Petitioner: Erskine D. Salter
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Parker v. USA
as 1:2023cv00083
Petitioner: Amber Lee Parker
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Owens v. USA
as 1:2023cv00059
Petitioner: Edwin Jerome Owens
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Clifton v. USA
as 1:2023cv00055
Petitioner: Angela Clifton
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Mitchell v. United States of America (INMATE 2) We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2023cv00015
Plaintiff: Nettisia Mitchell
Defendant: United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Becerra-Rodriguez v. USA
as 1:2023cv00054
Petitioner: Victor Manuel Becerra-Rodriguez
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Harris v. United States of America (INMATE 1)
as 3:2023cv00072
Plaintiff: Tori Harris
Defendant: United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Meece v. USA
as 1:2023cv00056
Petitioner: Nicole Lynn Meece
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Korcz v. United States of America We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2023cv08002
Petitioner: Elizabeth Korcz, MD
Respondent: United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?