Cases 1 - 10 of 17,947
Troup v. United States of America
as 1:2024cv02654
Petitioner:
Tory Lenard Troup
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Spivack, Jeffrey v. United States of America
as 9:2024cv80748
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Spivack
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
United States of America
as 1:2024cv22321
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Sanchez, Jr, Fernando v. United States of America
as 1:2024cv22258
Plaintiff:
Fernando Sanchez, Jr.
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Thompson v. United States of America
as 8:2024cv01436
Plaintiff:
Aaron Thompson
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Little v. United States of America
as 6:2024cv01083
Petitioner:
Michael Dexter Little
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Singleton v. United States Of America
as 2:2024cv00077
Petitioner:
Ervin Singleton, Erwin Debinion Singleton, Ervin Debinion Singleton and others
Respondent:
United States Of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
LITTLE v. USA
as 3:2024cv00050
Petitioner:
BRYAN SHAMAR LITTLE
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Aleman-Rivera v. United States of America
as 8:2024cv00916
Plaintiff:
Rafael Aleman-Rivera
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Ford v. United States of America
as 2:2024cv08012
Petitioner:
DeAnte Marquise Ford
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
