Cases 11 - 20 of 2,158
Brewer v. Crabtree et al
as 6:2024cv00396
Petitioner:
Stephen D Brewer
Respondent:
Chadwick Crabtree and Attorney General of the State of Alabama, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Watkins v. Morgan et al
as 5:2024cv00394
Petitioner:
Jessie James Watkins
Respondent:
Phyllis Morgan and Attorney General of the State of Alabama, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Emanger Gilbert v. Warden, et al
as 24-10858
Petitioner:
EMANGER L. GILBERT
Defendant:
WARDEN and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF ALABAMA
Swint v. Williams et al (INMATE 4)
as 2:2024cv00184
Plaintiff:
Darryl Swint
Defendant:
Karen Williams and State of Alabama
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
McCreary v. State of Alabama
as 1:2024cv00079
Petitioner:
Roger Lee McCreary
Respondent:
State of Alabama
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Boone v. Mack
as 1:2024cv00067
Petitioner:
George Boone, Jr.
Respondent:
State Of Alabama and Huey Hoss Mack
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Carter v. Headley et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2024cv00120
Plaintiff:
Thomas Ray Carter
Defendant:
Joseph H. Headley and The State of Alabama
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Kennedy Minnifield v. Limestone CF Warden, et al
as 24-10083
Petitioner:
KENNEDY MINNIFIELD
Respondent:
LIMESTONE CF WARDEN and ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF ALABAMA
McDaniel v. Crabtree et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2023cv00744
Plaintiff:
Markel Jason McDaniel
Defendant:
Chadwick Crabtree, Alabama Bureau of Pardons and Paroles and State of Alabama
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Michael Stovall v. Hamilton A & I Warden, et al
as 23-14130
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL LEON STOVALL
Respondent:
HAMILTON A & I WARDEN and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF ALABAMA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
