Cases 31 - 40 of 117
Lewis v. Entrekin et al
as 4:2016cv00143
Petitioner:
Christopher Lamont Lewis
Respondent:
Todd Entrekin, Luther Strange, Joseph Willoughby and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Brunette v. Amerson
as 1:2015cv01253
Petitioner:
Nathaniel Allen Brunette
Respondent:
Larry Amerson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Love v. Taylor
as 1:2015cv00228
Petitioner:
Van Allen Love
Respondent:
William T Taylor
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Madden v. Gay et al
as 4:2014cv00532
Petitioner:
Fred Allen Madden
Respondent:
David Gay, David Canidate, K. D. William and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Jones-Bey v. State of Alabama et al
as 2:2014cv00376
Petitioner:
Allen Demetrius Jones-Bey
Respondent:
State of Alabama and Leon Forniss
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Armstrong v. State of Alabama Department of Corrections et al (INMATE 3)
as 1:2014cv00096
Plaintiff:
Anthony Allen Armstrong
Defendant:
State of Alabama Department of Corrections and Cynthia Stewart
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Taylor v. Mobile County Metro Jail
as 1:2013cv00055
Petitioner:
Allen R. Taylor
Respondent:
Mobile County Metro Jail
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Spencer v. Bentley et al
as 7:2013cv00090
Petitioner:
James Edward Spencer
Respondent:
Robert Bentley, Bob Riley, Don Siegelman and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Batts v. Alabama Department of Corrections et al
as 5:2012cv02981
Petitioner:
Porter Allen Batts
Respondent:
Alabama Department of Corrections and Attorney General of the State of Alabama, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Gladden v. Blount County et al
as 2:2012cv01936
Petitioner:
John Allen Gladden
Respondent:
Blount County , State of Alabama and Attorney General of the State of Alabama, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
