Cases 41 - 50 of 161
Johnson v. Jenkins
as 1:2022cv03148
Petitioner:
Alvin Stevenson Johnson
Respondent:
Sylvester L. Jenkins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
JOHNSON v. JENKINS
as 5:2022cv00240
Petitioner:
ALVIN STEVENSON JOHNSON
Respondent:
SYLVESTER L JENKINS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Thomas v. Jenkins
as 1:2022cv02458
Petitioner:
Romon M. Thomas
Respondent:
Warden Jenkins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Graddy et al v. Carr et al
as 1:2022cv01557
Plaintiff:
Paul J. Graddy
Defendant:
Christopher M. Carr, Patrick Labat, Mr. Jackson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Graves v. Carr et al
as 1:2022cv01212
Petitioner:
Scottie Lee Graves
Respondent:
Christopher M. Carr, The Attorney General of the State of Georgia,, Patrick Labat and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Russell v. Jenkins
as 1:2022cv00389
Petitioner:
Joe B. Russell, Jr.
Respondent:
Warden Jenkins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lokey v. Warden Jenkins
as 1:2022cv00101
Petitioner:
Travis Lokey
Respondent:
Warden Jenkins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Jenkins v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al
as 5:2021cv00538
Petitioner:
Javonne Jenkins
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections and Florida Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Jacobson v. Labat et al
as 1:2021cv03462
Petitioner:
David Otto Jacobson
Respondent:
Sheriff Labat, Fulton County Jail and Major Jenkins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Touizer v. Jenkins et al
as 1:2021cv22813
Plaintiff:
Daniel Joseph Touizer
Defendant:
Warden Sylvester L. Jenkins, Merrick Garland and Michael Carvajal
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
