Cases 1 - 10 of 77
Bailey v. Warden, FCC Coleman USP 1
as 5:2024cv00197
Petitioner:
Deon Anthony Romell Bailey
Respondent:
Warden, FCC Coleman USP 1
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Bailey v. McClain et al (INMATE 2)
as 3:2024cv00157
Plaintiff:
James Leslie Bailey
Defendant:
Antonio McClain and Randolph County
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bailey v. Morgan
as 1:2023cv00358
Petitioner:
Paul Eugene Bailey
Respondent:
Phyllis Morgan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bailey v. Mack
as 1:2023cv00311
Petitioner:
Thomas Justin Bailey
Respondent:
Huey Hoss Mack
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Adonius Bailey v. Secretary, Department of Corrections, et al
as 23-11807
Petitioner / Appellant:
ADONIUS BAILEY
Respondent / Appellee:
SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA
BAILEY v. PISTRO
as 5:2023cv00104
Petitioner:
LEEOTIS BAILEY
Respondent:
KEVIN PISTRO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Jason Bailey v. Hays State Prison, et al
as 22-12505
Petitioner / Appellant:
JASON QUINARD BAILEY
Respondent / Appellee:
HAYS STATE PRISON and WARDEN
BAILEY v. PISTRO
as 5:2022cv00141
Petitioner:
CHARLES BAILEY
Respondent:
K PISTRO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Bailey v. Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2022cv00735
Petitioner:
Jeromy A. Bailey
Respondent:
Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections, Florida Attorney General and Secretary, Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bailey et al v. Gentry et al
as 5:2021cv01409
Petitioner:
Joey Lee Bailey and James Manely Cost, II
Respondent:
Matt Gentry and Martha Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
