Cases 1 - 10 of 41
Pearson v. Culliver et al (INMATE2)
as 2:2010cv00526
Plaintiff:
Clinton James Pearson, Jr.
Defendant:
Grant Culliver and Troy King
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Osborne v. Culliver et al
as 2:2009cv02338
Petitioner:
Kerrin Osborne
Respondent:
Grant Culliver and Attorney General of the State of Alabama, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
George v. Culliver et al (INMATE1)
as 1:2009cv00929
Plaintiff:
Vick Anthony George
Defendant:
Grant Culliver and Troy King
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Tomlin v. Culliver
as 1:2009cv00651
Petitioner:
Phillip Wayne Tomlin
Respondent:
Grant Culliver
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Johnson v. Culliver et al
as 2:2009cv01727
Petitioner:
Bonnide Johnson
Respondent:
Grant Culliver and Attorney General of the State of Alabama, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Minnifield v. Culliver
as 1:2009cv00529
Petitioner:
Kennedy Minnifield
Respondent:
Grant Culliver
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Sanders v. Culliver
as 1:2009cv00444
Petitioner:
George J. Sanders, Jr.
Respondent:
Grant Culliver
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
McLeod v. Culliver
as 1:2009cv00434
Petitioner:
Jackie McLeod
Respondent:
Grant Culliver
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
McLeod v. Culliver
as 1:2009cv00418
Petitioner:
Jackie McLeod
Respondent:
Grant Culliver
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Dubose v. Culliver et al
as 2:2009cv01392
Plaintiff:
Nkosi A. Dubose
Defendant:
Grant Culliver and Attorney General of the State of Alabama, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
