Cases 1 - 10 of 67
Mosley v. Williams
as 1:2023cv02260
Petitioner:
Mr. Demetrius Mosley
Respondent:
Mr. Doug Williams, Judge Craig L. Schwall, T. Coun. Tawanna L. Payton and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
LANE v. PISTROL
as 5:2022cv00189
Petitioner:
ANTHONY JAMES LANE
Respondent:
KEVIN PISTROL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Earll v. St. Lucie County Jail
as 2:2022cv14311
Plaintiff:
Justin Lane Earll
Defendant:
St. Lucie County Jail
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Lane v. Orange County Corrections Dept.
as 6:2022cv00501
Petitioner:
Gregory R. Lane
Respondent:
Orange County Corrections Dept.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Gayden v. Lane
as 8:2022cv00390
Petitioner:
John Matthew Gayden, Jr.
Respondent:
Kathy P. Lane and U.S. Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Gayden v. Lane
as 5:2022cv00104
Petitioner:
John Matthew Gayden, Jr.
Respondent:
Kathy P. Lane and U.S. Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Lane v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2021cv01246
Petitioner:
Frederick Lane
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections and Florida Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Lane v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al (Polk)
as 8:2021cv02806
Petitioner:
Steven Michael Lane
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections and Attorney General, State of Florida
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Reiblich v. Lane
as 8:2021cv02645
Petitioner:
Mitchell W. Reiblich
Respondent:
Christopher Lane
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Reiblich v. Lane
as 3:2021cv01111
Petitioner:
Mitchell W. Reiblich
Respondent:
Christopher Lane
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
