Cases 1 - 10 of 30
Gonzalez-Rodriguez v. Thomas
as 1:2024cv00648
Petitioner:
Arley Gonzalez-Rodriguez
Respondent:
Warden Thomas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Rodriguez v. Jenkins
as 1:2023cv03228
Petitioner:
Rolando Rodriguez
Respondent:
Warden Sylvester Jenkins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Castro-Rodriguez v. Jenkins
as 1:2023cv02691
Petitioner:
Jhon Castro-Rodriguez
Respondent:
Warden S. Jenkins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
RIVERA-RODRIGUEZ v. UNITED STATES
as 4:2023cv00070
Petitioner:
ERNESTO RIVERA-RODRIGUEZ
Respondent:
UNITED STATES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Rodriguez v. Fikes et al
as 5:2022cv00068
Petitioner:
Johnathan Rodriguez
Respondent:
Warden Jeffrey Fikes and FCI Jesup
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Rodriguez v. Fikes
as 2:2022cv00121
Petitioner:
Johnathan Rodriguez
Respondent:
Warden Jeffrey Fikes and FCI Jesup
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Lopez v. Stone
as 3:2022cv00165
Petitioner:
Walter Rodriguez Lopez
Respondent:
Warden Stacey N. Stone and Warden, USP Atlanta
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Rodriguez v. Stone
as 3:2022cv00154
Petitioner:
Efren Arboleda Rodriguez
Respondent:
Stacey N. Stone
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Newell v. Fikes
as 2:2022cv00053
Petitioner:
Carlos Rodriguez Newell
Respondent:
Warden J. Fikes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
CHARLESTON v. GARY
as 5:2021cv00450
Petitioner:
RODRIGUEZ CHARLESTON
Respondent:
CAPTAIN JOHN GARY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
