General Cases filed in Alabama
Poores v. Toney et al (INMATE 3) We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 7:2022cv00473
Plaintiff: Clinton Lee Poores
Defendant: Deborah Toney, Steven T Marshall and State of Alabama
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Poores v. Toney et al (INMATE 3) We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2022cv00154
Plaintiff: Clinton Lee Poores
Defendant: Deborah Toney, Steven T. Marshall and State of Alabama
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Pearson v. Jones et al (INMATE 3)
as 2:2021cv00809
Plaintiff: Clinton James Pearson, Jr.
Defendant: Patrice Richie Jones and Steven T. Marshall
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Pearson v. Jones et al (INMATE 3) We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2021cv00656
Plaintiff: Clinton James Pearson, Jr.
Defendant: Ellen Brooks, John Hartley, Steven T. Marshall and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Pearson v. Hetzel, et al. (INMATE 3) We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2014cv00100
Plaintiff: Clinton James Pearson, Jr.
Defendant: Gary Hetzel and Luther Strange
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Pearson v. Patterson et al (INMATE 2) We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2013cv00454
Plaintiff: Clinton James Pearson, Jr.
Defendant: Tony Patterson and Luther Strange
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Pearson v. Culliver et al (INMATE2) We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2010cv00526
Plaintiff: Clinton James Pearson, Jr.
Defendant: Grant Culliver and Troy King
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Pearson v. Garrett et al (INMATE2)
as 2:2007cv00748
Plaintiff: Clinton James Pearson, Jr.
Defendant: Archie Garrett, David Wise and Troy King
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?