Cases 161 - 170 of 37,144
Augustin, Jose A. v. Lin et al
as 9:2024cv80551
Plaintiff:
Jose Anderson Augustin
Defendant:
Adam Lin and Swigert Anthony
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
DAVIS v. FRANKLIN CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION et al
as 4:2024cv00190
Plaintiff:
LLOYD ANTHONY DAVIS
Defendant:
FRANKLIN CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION, REGION 1 PHARMACY and FNU PAWKK
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Achey v. Drug Enforcement Administration
as 5:2024cv00222
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Achey
Defendant:
Drug Enforcement Administration
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Mills v. Clay County Courts et al
as 3:2024cv00420
Plaintiff:
Wallace Mills
Defendant:
Clay County Courts and Clay County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
LEIGH v. HANCOCK STATE PRISON WARDEN
as 5:2024cv00130
Plaintiff:
TREMAINE DESHUN LEIGH
Defendant:
HANCOCK STATE PRISON WARDEN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Banks v. State of Georgia et al
as 1:2024cv01243
Plaintiff:
Angelo Bernard Banks
Defendant:
State of Georgia and Georgia Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Prisoner Civil Rights
Tabitha McKenzie v. Casey Barren, et al
as 24-10852
Plaintiff:
TABITHA MCKENZIE
Defendant:
CASEY T. BARREN, ERIC LOVE, GOVERNOR OF FLORIDA and others
JONES v. SOLITARY WATCH et al
as 4:2024cv00133
Plaintiff:
JESSIE W JONES
Defendant:
SOLITARY WATCH, DONALD J TRUMP, JOHN KIRBY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ramos v. Fayette County Jail (Detention Center)
as 3:2024cv00053
Plaintiff:
Alexis Ramos
Defendant:
Fayette County Jail (Detention Center)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
RUSSAW v. TALTON et al
as 5:2024cv00088
Plaintiff:
ALBERT MARIO RUSSAW
Defendant:
CULLEN TALTON, ADA RODRIGO L SILVA, EDWARD D LUKEMIRE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
