Cases 31 - 40 of 140
Faison v. Chief Judge of the Eleventh Judicial Circuit, et al
as 1:2019cv21560
Defendant:
State Attorney, Florida Probation and Parole Commission and Chief Judge of the Eleventh Judicial Circuit
Plaintiff:
Matthew Faison
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. ICE et al
as 4:2019cv00107
Defendant:
Jonathan Hortan, US Probation, USCIS and others
Plaintiff:
Vaughn Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. ICE et al
as 1:2019cv20230
Defendant:
DOS, ICE, US Probation and others
Plaintiff:
Vaughn Johnson
Johnson v. ICE et al
as 6:2019cv00040
Defendant:
Jonathan Hortan, US Probation, USCIS and others
Plaintiff:
Vaughn Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Reid v. Phillips et al
as 0:2018cv62721
Plaintiff:
Patty N. Reid
Defendant:
Kathleen Phillips, South Florida's Guardianship Program, Unknown Defendant and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
MCCOMSEY v. DENSMORE et al
as 5:2018cv00341
Defendant:
PROBATION BUTTS COUNTY, STEVEN BRIAN THOMPSON and SHANAE DENSMORE
Plaintiff:
JACQUELINE MCCOMSEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
FOWLER v. GOSS et al
as 1:2018cv00143
Defendant:
CLERK EVONNE MULL, ATTORNEY CHARLES ARNOLD, JR, ATTORNEY GENERAL CHRISTOPHER CARR and others
Plaintiff:
TOREY FOWLER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bell et al v. Department of Justice et al
as 8:2018cv01521
Plaintiff:
Joshua C. Bell, J. C. Bell and J. L. Bell
Defendant:
Department of Justice, Sheriff's Office, Probation Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Moton v. Brooks et al
as 6:2018cv00916
Plaintiff:
Mack Moton
Defendant:
Paul Brooks and Titusville Probation Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WHITE v. STATE OF GEORGIA et al
as 3:2018cv00064
Plaintiff:
CHARLES LAMAR WHITE, JR
Defendant:
STATE OF GEORGIA, WALTON COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT, ALCOVY JUDICIAL CIRCUIT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
