Cases 41 - 50 of 82
Burns v. Osceola County Jail Corrections Department et al
as 6:2015cv02054
Plaintiff:
James Thomas Burns, Jr.
Defendant:
Osceola County Jail Corrections Department, Martin Linnekugel, Srg. Burger and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Burnes v. Fannin et al
as 1:2015cv02142
Defendant:
Jed Fannin, Ryan Rumsey, Steve Giddens and others
Plaintiff:
Brandon Lamar Burnes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ledcke v. Rathman et al
as 1:2015cv02137
Plaintiff:
Shawn Michael Ledcke
Defendant:
John T Rathman, Becky Clay, Walter Vereen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Armbrester v. Lloyds London Ins Underwriter et al
as 2:2015cv01738
Plaintiff:
Ronald Armbrester
Defendant:
Lloyds London Ins Underwriter, Inga Beal, Burns and Wilcox LTD Insurance Agency and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Coen et al v. Scott et al
as 2:2015cv00409
Plaintiff:
Gerald Coen and Patricia Coen
Defendant:
Mike Scott , FNU Bastedo, Corizon Health Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Perry v. Brown et al
as 1:2015cv01263
Plaintiff:
Charles W. Perry
Defendant:
Thomas Brown, J. L. Mann, DeKalb County Board of Commissioners and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DeLano Fuller v. Jim Gates, et al
as 15-11298
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DELANO RENEE FULLER
Defendant - Appellee:
JIM GATES, Capt., JONATHAN STIDHAM, Col, RONNIE HALL, Col and others
Townsend v. Carter et al
as 4:2014cv01911
Plaintiff:
Arlo Townsend
Defendant:
Ronald Carter, Brandon Burns, COI Lindsay and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Burns v. Thomas et al
as 2:2014cv01174
Plaintiff:
Roy Burns
Defendant:
Kim Thomas and Alabama Department of Corrections
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney 4
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Burns v. Alabama Department of Corrections et al
as 5:2014cv00636
Plaintiff:
Roy Lee Burns
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney
Defendant:
Alabama Department of Corrections and Kim Thomas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
