Cases 41 - 50 of 138
Davis v. Doe 1 et al
as 2:2021cv14021
Plaintiff:
De Javar C. Davis
Defendant:
John Doe 2, John Doe 1 and John Doe 3
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Chambers v. Pounds et al
as 1:2021cv00112
Defendant:
John Doe #1, Sgt. Miranda, John Doe #2 and others
Plaintiff:
Roy Chambers, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davis-Bey v. Pooler et al
as 1:2020cv24967
Defendant:
John Doe #5, John Doe #4, Judge Teresa Pooler and others
Plaintiff:
Ronald E. Davis-Bey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SEATS v. MAJORS et al
as 3:2020cv00127
Defendant:
OFFICER BRANDON TEMPLES, OFFICER JOHN DOE 2, OFFICER NATHAN MAJORS and others
Plaintiff:
MOSES SOLOMON ISAIAH SEATS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dean v. Doe et al
as 5:2020cv00428
Defendant:
Jane Doe, FNU Tidwell, John/Jane Doe and others
Plaintiff:
Todd G Dean
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Altman v. Miller et al
as 4:2020cv10088
Defendant:
John Doe, 2, West Care, Kenneth Miller and others
Plaintiff:
Johnathan Blair Altman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ham v. Inch et al
as 9:2020cv81071
Defendant:
Francisco Acosta, Sargeant John Doe #3, SGT. Salmon and others
Plaintiff:
Ottis Lee Ham
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Leung v. Duval County - (Jacksonville) Sheriff's Department et al
as 3:2020cv00635
Defendant:
All John and Jane Doe's, Duval County - (Jacksonville) Sheriff's Department, Detective John Doe, #2 and others
Plaintiff:
Jahi Shamel Leung
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jordan v. State of GA et al
as 1:2020cv02255
Defendant:
Officer John Doe 2, City of Atlanta, State of GA and others
Plaintiff:
Bradley H. Jordan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bermudez v. City of West Palm Beach et al
as 9:2020cv80765
Defendant:
City of West Palm Beach, Sheriff Department of West Palm Beach FL, Officer John Doe #1 and others
Plaintiff:
Narciso Rosales Bermudez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
