Cases 51 - 60 of 139
Jordan v. State of GA et al
as 1:2020cv02255
Defendant:
Officer John Doe 2, City of Atlanta, State of GA and others
Plaintiff:
Bradley H. Jordan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
FOWLER v. STATE OF GEORGIA et al
as 5:2020cv00171
Defendant:
JOHN OR JANE DOE 1, CAPTAIN DAVIS, GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and others
Plaintiff:
SAMUEL LEWIS FOWLER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Coates v. United States Department of Justice et al
as 1:2019cv25190
Plaintiff:
Joseph Coates
Defendant:
United States Marshals Service, John Doe #1, The Unknown named Policy Holders for the United States Marshals Service and others
Bright v. Hillsborough County et al
as 8:2019cv02274
Defendant:
John Doe, 2, CSA Chambers, FNU Edwards and others
Plaintiff:
Leon Bright
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Randolph v. City of Baldwin Police Department et al
as 2:2019cv00147
Defendant:
John Doe #5, John Doe #4, Chief of Police and others
Plaintiff:
Joshua Brian Randolph
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Womack v. Wilkes et al
as 1:2019cv00104
Defendant:
John Doe 1, Dr. Alston, John Doe 2 and others
Plaintiff:
Tyrone Womack
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Allgood v. Florida Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2019cv21095
Defendant:
John Doe # 5, Sgt Moss, John Doe # 2 and others
Plaintiff:
Jerry Dean Allgood, II
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Borroto v. Lees et al
as 6:2019cv00851
Defendant:
John Doe 9, Peter Crank, Lees Eid and others
Plaintiff:
Ramon Armas Borroto, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Randolph v. City of Baldwin, Georgia et al
as 2:2019cv00044
Defendant:
John Doe #5, John Doe #4, John Doe #1 and others
Plaintiff:
Joshua Brian Randolph
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jiminez v. Everglades C.I., Warden et al
as 1:2019cv20878
Plaintiff:
Darwin Joel Ruiz Jiminez
Defendant:
Everglades C.I., Captain, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections, John Doe 2 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
