Cases 1 - 10 of 19
Williams v. Thompson et al
as 2:2023cv00945
Plaintiff:
Ryan Keith Williams
Defendant:
J. Thompson, M. Ledoux, J. Jordan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Haney v. Prummell et al
as 2:2022cv00680
Plaintiff:
James Wesley Haney
Defendant:
Bill Prummell, Norman Wilson, Corizon Health Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BRYAN v. OKALOOSA COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS et al
as 3:2021cv00017
Defendant:
SUSAN PRIDDY, MAJOR ROBERTS, OKALOOSA COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS and others
Plaintiff:
RICARDO BRYAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Phillips v. Pavirov et al
as 5:2019cv00888
Defendant:
Juan Bailey, Florence, Corizon Health Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Matthew Sherman Phillips
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GAINES v. JONES et al
as 3:2018cv01332
Petitioner:
LORINE GAINES
Respondent:
Julie Jones, Corizon Health Inc and Kevin D. Jordan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Watkins v. Ms. Barber et al
as 1:2017cv00311
Plaintiff:
Gerald Watkins
Defendant:
Ms. Barber and Corizon Health, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tate v. Corizon Health Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv00272
Plaintiff:
Ricky David Tate
Defendant:
Corizon Health Inc. and Butch Conway
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Curry v. Corizon Health, Inc. et al
as 2:2017cv14017
Petitioner:
David T. Curry
Respondent:
Corizon Health, Inc., George Jorge, M.D., Misty Gaddis, ARNP and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Arthur Malloy v. Kenneth Peters, et al
as 16-16374
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ARTHUR BRENNAN MALLOY
Defendant - Appellee:
KENNETH N. PETERS, CORIZON HEALTH, INC. and ALABAMA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Meadows v. Bates et al
as 1:2016cv03157
Plaintiff:
Ralph Eugene Meadows
Defendant:
Cheryl Lynn Bates, R.L. Butch Conway, Corizon, L.L.C. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
