Cases 1 - 10 of 1,679
MAKENDY v. SUMMERS et al
as 4:2024cv00252
Plaintiff:
ALFRED MAKENDY
Defendant:
W SUMMERS, MAJOR CHILDS, T MCCROWSKY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
v. KROFT et al
as 1:2024cv00100
Defendant:
JIMMY LEE KROFT, WALKER, COLLINS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HAMILTON v. JESTER et al
as 5:2024cv00186
Plaintiff:
STANLEY L HAMILTON
Defendant:
WARDEN TEKETA JESTER, DEPUTY WARDEN NICHOLAS BROWN, LACHAKA MCKENZIE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Robert Tlusty v. D. Swain, et al
as 24-11921
Plaintiff:
ROBERT J. TLUSTY
Defendant:
D. SWAIN, Correctional Officer, K. DAVIS, Correctional Officer, J. ELLENBURG, Correctional Officer and others
SMITH v. DECATUR COUNTY PRISON et al
as 1:2024cv00085
Plaintiff:
HAROLD UNYULA SMITH, SR
Defendant:
DECATUR COUNTY PRISON, WARDEN GORDON SCREEN, JR and JOHN AND OR JANE DOES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Norfleet v. Riggs et al
as 8:2024cv01407
Plaintiff:
Tino A. Norfleet
Defendant:
E. Riggs, John Doe #1, John Doe #2 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WATSON v. DOE et al
as 5:2024cv00171
Plaintiff:
TYRONE WATSON
Defendant:
JOHN DOE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thevenin v. Bradshaw et al
as 9:2024cv80682
Plaintiff:
Loveus Thevenin
Defendant:
Ric L. Bradshaw and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Jones et al
as 5:2024cv00272
Plaintiff:
Marcus Johnson
Defendant:
C Jones, D. Luke, FNU Perkins and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Wihly Harpo-Brown v. FCI Coleman Low Warden, et al
as 24-11694
Plaintiff:
WIHLY HARPO-BROWN
Defendant:
FCI COLEMAN LOW WARDEN, JOHN DOE, Assistant Warden, Coleman Low, Inmate Affairs and Operations, JANE DOE, Assistant Warden, Coleman Low, Inmate Affairs and Operations and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
