Cases 1 - 9 of 9
JONES v. SOLITARY WATCH et al
as 4:2024cv00133
Plaintiff:
JESSIE W JONES
Defendant:
SOLITARY WATCH, DONALD J TRUMP, JOHN KIRBY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JONES v. LAKE CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION et al
as 4:2024cv00063
Plaintiff:
JESSIE WIMSY JONES
Defendant:
LAKE CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION, PATRICK MAHONEY, DADE CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hodge v. Mahoney et al
as 8:2021cv01498
Defendant:
David R. Mahoney, Daniel M. Leyden, Ronald E. Slater and others
Plaintiff:
Everett Anthony Hodge
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McCrimmon et al v. Centurion of Florida, LLC et al
as 3:2020cv00036
Defendant:
K. MCCARTER, L. SWANSON, Tamara Taylor and others
Plaintiff:
Caron Dettmann and Sarah McCrimmon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Lambrix et al v. Warden, Union Correctional Institution et al
as 1:2014cv24500
Plaintiff:
Michael Lambrix, Ronald W. Clark, Jr. and Jason Walton
Defendant:
Warden, Union Correctional Institution, Randall L. Mobley and Mary Mahoney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2011cv00291
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Porter v. Moore et al
as 1:2009cv22342
Plaintiff:
Kunta Kinte Porter
Defendant:
Michael W. Moore, M.R. Mahoney, Mike Hicks and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Logue v. Chatham County Detention Center et al
as 4:2008cv00042
Plaintiff:
Clarence Redmond Logue, Jr.
Defendant:
Chatham County Detention Center, McAuthor Holmes, Joe Mahoney and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Singleton v. Mahoney et al
as 9:2007cv80914
Plaintiff:
Jwan Singleton
Defendant:
Tom Mahoney and Grey Shelton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
