Civil Rights Cases filed in the Eleventh Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 97
Rogers v. Ramos et al
as 8:2024cv01451
Plaintiff: Rafel Rogers
Defendant: Luis Efren Ramos, Jr. and Bernardo Lopez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ramos v. Fayette County Jail (Detention Center)
as 3:2024cv00053
Plaintiff: Alexis Ramos
Defendant: Fayette County Jail (Detention Center)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Haimanio v. DeKalb County Police Department et al
as 1:2024cv00949
Plaintiff: APOJON PAPA HAIMANIO
Defendant: DeKalb County Police Department, MONICA PANOSIAN, Gregory Moore and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Birmele v. Ramos et al
as 8:2024cv00292
Plaintiff: John Birmele
Defendant: Correction Officer R Ramds, Correction Officer J. Hunter, Correction Officer R. Doll and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Joseph v. Ramos et al
as 2:2023cv00969
Plaintiff: Kacy Joseph
Defendant: Ramos and Cannistraci
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Erwin v. Ramos
as 6:2023cv01821
Plaintiff: James Erwin
Defendant: Steven Ramos
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Erwin v. Ramos
as 6:2023cv01496
Plaintiff: James Erwin
Defendant: Orange County Sheriff Department and OCSO Steven Ramos
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lyons v. Woods et al
as 5:2023cv00176
Plaintiff: James E Lyons
Defendant: Billy Woods, Anna Marie Macafee, Alisha Torres and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Joseph v. Ramos et al
as 2:2022cv00774
Plaintiff: Kacy Joseph
Defendant: Ramos and Cannistraci
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bowden v. Frost et al
as 2:2022cv00738
Plaintiff: Christopher J Bowden
Defendant: M. Frost, E. Ramos, A. Cassner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?