Cases 11 - 20 of 23
MURPHY v. MIDDLEBROOKS et al
as 3:2017cv00314
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM T MURPHY
Defendant:
SCOTT MIDDLEBROOKS, CHARLES MAIORANA, ANDRES MOLINA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JOHNSON v. GEO GROUP INC, et al
as 5:2017cv00110
Plaintiff:
KENNETH JOHNSON
Defendant:
GEO GROUP INC, CORRECT CARE SOLUTIONS, G POYTHRESS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
OLSON v. CREWS et al
as 5:2016cv00345
Plaintiff:
KEITH OLSON
Defendant:
MICHAEL D CREWS, GRACEVILLE CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, GEO CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lawson v. Nicholson et al
as 8:2015cv02685
Plaintiff:
David Bryan Lawson
Defendant:
Rita Nicholson, Lynette Maggs, Correct Care Solutions and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Constantino v. Nocco et al
as 8:2015cv02397
Plaintiff:
Kraig Constantino
Defendant:
Chris Nocco, Deputy Schiller, Deputy Elswick and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fitzpatrick v. Pasco County Correctional Facility et al
as 8:2015cv01667
Plaintiff:
John Fitzpatrick
Defendant:
Pasco County Correctional Facility and Correct Care Solutions
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hall v. Levett et al.
as 1:2015cv02046
Plaintiff:
Johnathan I. Hall
Defendant:
Eric J. Levett, Rockdale County Jail and Correct Care Solutions
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Grant v. Nocco et al
as 8:2015cv00483
Plaintiff:
Christopher Allan Grant
Defendant:
Chris Nocco, Edward Beckman, Renee Bingham and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Grant v. Nocco et al
as 8:2014cv03153
Plaintiff:
Christopher Grant
Defendant:
Chris Nocco, Edward Beckman, Correct Care Solutions and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Luke v. Richmond County Sheriff's Department et al
as 1:2013cv00013
Plaintiff:
Michael Luke
Defendant:
Richmond County Sheriff's Department, Richard Roundtree, Chester Huffman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
