Cases 21 - 30 of 219
HAYES v. BENNETT et al
as 4:2023cv00184
Plaintiff:
JEROME HAYES
Defendant:
BENNETT and LURRY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BLAKE v. LEAVINS et al
as 3:2023cv11445
Plaintiff:
KEVIN LEONOUR BLAKE
Defendant:
DONALD LEAVINS, T BUTLER, RICHBURG and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. District Attorneys Office et al
as 5:2023cv00041
Plaintiff:
Roger Smith, Jr.
Defendant:
District Attorneys Office, Waycross Judicial Circuit, Marilyn Bennett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bennett v. Emmons et al
as 4:2023cv00074
Plaintiff:
Danny Ray Bennett
Defendant:
Warden Shawn Emmons, Joshua Jones and Jeffery Balled
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Blake v. Young et al
as 3:2023cv00399
Plaintiff:
Kevin Lamar Blake
Defendant:
E. S. Young, R. Covey, W. Shomp and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Blake v. White et al
as 3:2023cv00341
Plaintiff:
Kevin Lamar Blake
Defendant:
Officer White, H. Coovey, E. Prock and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Woods v. Sink et al
as 9:2023cv80460
Plaintiff:
Roger Woods
Defendant:
Ms Sink, Ms Fancie, GEO Care, Health Services and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Murzike v. Green et al
as 3:2023cv00075
Plaintiff:
James T. Murzike
Defendant:
R. Green, Sgt. Rulevitch, C.O. Mattox and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Murzike v. Williams et al
as 3:2023cv00098
Plaintiff:
James T. Murzike
Defendant:
R. Williams, J. Taylor, R. Green and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Alonsa et al v. Wilcher
as 4:2022cv00214
Plaintiff:
Humberto Mendez Alonsa, Jose Torres Gomez, James Blige and others
Defendant:
Sheriff John T. Wilcher
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
