Cases 21 - 30 of 91
Brown v. City of Savannah Police Department
as 4:2021cv00118
Defendant:
City of Savannah Police Department
Plaintiff:
James Clarence Brown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MADISON et al v. CITY OF ASHBURN
as 1:2020cv00262
Plaintiff:
Decina Peterson, Donald Maurice Madison Sr. and DONALD MAURICE MADISON, SR
Defendant:
CITY OF ASHBURN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Madison Sr. et al v. City of Ashburn
as 2:2020cv00137
Plaintiff:
Decina Peterson and Donald Maurice Madison Sr.
Defendant:
City of Ashburn
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Henderson v. Augusta Judicial Circuit et al
as 1:2020cv00175
Defendant:
Christopher M. Carr, Augusta Judicial Circuit, The City of Augusta and others
Plaintiff:
Tavarres J. Henderson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Baker v. Unknown Government Officials et al
as 4:2020cv00295
Defendant:
Unknown Government Officials and Any and All State, County, City, or Federal Officials
Plaintiff:
John Shane Baker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BROWN v. THOMAS et al
as 4:2020cv00098
Defendant:
CITY OF CUSSETA, TAMMY THOMAS and CHATTAHOOCHEE COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE
Plaintiff:
JESSE BROWN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ross v. Nielsen et al
as 4:2020cv00045
Defendant:
Officer John Doe, Jane Does, Hillary Nielsen and others
Plaintiff:
Steven Andrew Ross
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
REEVES v. JORDAN et al
as 5:2020cv00032
Defendant:
PULASKI STATE PRISON, EASTMAN CITY and VICKEY JORDAN
Plaintiff:
NICOLE JOLITA REEVES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Graham v. Richardson et al
as 4:2020cv00011
Defendant:
Officer John Doe, City of Pooler, Officer Jane Doe and others
Plaintiff:
Takaeus Makeon Graham
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WALLER v. CITY OF EATONTON GEORGIA et al
as 5:2019cv00417
Defendant:
EATONTON POLICE DEPARTMENT, CITY OF EATONTON GEORGIA and DETECTIVE HOWELL CARDWELL
Plaintiff:
THURSTON C WALLER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
