Cases 111 - 120 of 5,196
Edmonds et al v. The Docks, LLC et al
as 5:2022cv00869
Plaintiff:
Austin Edmonds, Deborah Fletcher, Lashawna Matthews and others
Defendant:
The Docks, LLC and Chief Mark Hall
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Hatcher v. Wharf Casual Seafood Montgomery, Inc.
as 2:2022cv00308
Plaintiff:
Stevie Hatcher
Defendant:
Wharf Casual Seafood Montgomery, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Mayo-Keller v. SDH Pizza Inc et al
as 2:2022cv00675
Plaintiff:
Devone Mayo-Keller
Defendant:
SDH Pizza Inc and Steven Douglas Hall
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Adams v. Premier Pizza Inc et al
as 4:2022cv00702
Plaintiff:
Scott Adams
Defendant:
Premier Pizza Inc and Billy James Hall
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Sambo v. Amwaste LLC
as 2:2022cv00647
Plaintiff:
Thomas Sambo
Defendant:
Amwaste LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Ajoloko v. Jamas Technology Inc
as 2:2022cv00677
Plaintiff:
Pamela Ajoloko
Defendant:
Jamas Technology Inc
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
McCullough v. Mr. Pool, Inc. et al
as 2:2022cv00373
Plaintiff:
Eric McCullough
Defendant:
Mr. Pool, Inc. and Ryan Williams
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Fournier v. Autozoners, LLC et al
as 1:2022cv00192
Plaintiff:
Marie Fournier
Defendant:
Autozoners, LLC and Autozone Stores, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Mitchell v. Town of Hayneville, Alabama
as 2:2022cv00198
Plaintiff:
Kelvin Mitchell
Defendant:
Town of Hayneville, Alabama
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0207 Fair Labor Standards Act
Perez v. Sushivillage AL Inc
as 2:2022cv00517
Plaintiff:
Oscar G Perez
Defendant:
Sushivillage AL Inc and Sushi Village AL Inc
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family and Medical Leave Act (1993)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
