Cases 41 - 50 of 3,157
Kent-Stevens v. CHS Employee Group LLC d/b/a YesCare
as 8:2024cv00796
Plaintiff:
Amber Kent-Stevens
Defendant:
CHS Employee Group LLC d/b/a YesCare and CHS Employee Group LLC doing business as YesCare
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family Medical Leave Act
Mellon v. McKibben Powersports, Inc.
as 8:2024cv00779
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Mellon
Defendant:
McKibben Powersports, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family Medical Leave Act
Phillips v. MHC
as 1:2024cv01381
Plaintiff:
Edward Phillips
Defendant:
MHC doing business as Georgia Kenworth
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family and Medical Leave Act
Finch v. LBF Equity LLC
as 1:2024cv00388
Plaintiff:
Michael Finch
Defendant:
LBF Equity LLC doing business as Lee Brass Foundry LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family and Medical Leave Act (1993)
Kingston v. Ford Motor Company et al
as 1:2024cv01332
Plaintiff:
Neil Kingston
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company and Danyell Walker
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family and Medical Leave Act
Shahzadi v. ENTERPRISE LEASING COMPANY OF FLORIDA, LLC
as 0:2024cv60469
Plaintiff:
Nomaira Shahzadi
Defendant:
ENTERPRISE LEASING COMPANY OF FLORIDA, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2611 Family Medical Leave Act
Miranda v. Miami-Dade Cardiology Consultants, LLC et al
as 1:2024cv21115
Plaintiff:
Sandra Miranda
Defendant:
Miami-Dade Cardiology Consultants, LLC and HCA Health Services of Miami, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Keytack v. Amazon.com Services LLC
as 2:2024cv00355
Plaintiff:
Joseph Keytack
Defendant:
Amazon.com Services LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family and Medical Leave Act (1993)
Staten v. Hobby Lobby Stores, Inc.
as 4:2024cv00082
Plaintiff:
Penny Staten
Defendant:
Hobby Lobby Stores, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family and Medical Leave Act
Chaumont v. AT&T CORP.
as 1:2024cv21110
Plaintiff:
Vance Chaumont
Defendant:
AT&T CORP.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2611 Family Medical Leave Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
