Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Wiley v. JP Morgan Chase & Co.
as 9:2023cv81518
Plaintiff:
Thomas P. Wiley
Defendant:
JP Morgan Chase & Co.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Labor
Wiley v. JP Morgan Chase & Co.
as 9:2023cv81517
Plaintiff:
Thomas P. Wiley
Defendant:
JP Morgan Chase & Co.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2022cv61904
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Hudson v. JP Morgan Chase & Co.
as 9:2020cv81494
Plaintiff:
J Steven Hudson
Defendant:
JP Morgan Chase & Co.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Knopp v. JP Morgan Chase & Co.
as 8:2020cv01811
Plaintiff:
Aida Knopp
Defendant:
JP Morgan Chase & Co.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
Alexandra Pagnozzi v. JP Morgan Chase Medical Plan, et al
as 16-13310
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ALEXANDRA PAGNOZZI
Defendant - Appellee:
JP MORGAN CHASE MEDICAL PLAN and UNITED BEHAVIORAL HEALTH, INC.
Pagnozzi v. JP Morgan Chase Medical Plan et al
as 1:2015cv21249
Plaintiff:
Alexandra Pagnozzi
Defendant:
JP Morgan Chase Medical Plan and United Behavioral Health, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Wilson v. JP Morgan Chase and Co.
as 8:2008cv01955
Plaintiff:
Scott Wilson
Defendant:
JP Morgan Chase and Co.
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Atlantic Southeast Airlines, Inc. et al v. M.L.M. et al
as 1:2008cv01821
Plaintiff:
Atlantic Southeast Airlines, Inc., Atlantic Southeast Airlines, Inc., Atlantic Southeast Airlines, Inc. Investment Savings Plan and others
Defendant:
M.L.M. and Douglas Morgan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1335 Interpleader Action
Abdul-Hakim v. JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A.
as 1:2008cv00019
Plaintiff:
Aethnae Ingrid Abdul-Hakim
Defendant:
JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. and JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - E.R.I.S.A.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
