Cases 171 - 180 of 1,048
Lance Williams v. Scott Kernan, et al
as 19-55833
Respondent / Appellee:
SCOTT KERNAN, Director of Corrections and DANIEL PARAMO, Warden
Petitioner / Appellant:
LANCE WILLIAMS
Hector Anderson v. Scott Kernan, et al
as 19-16062
Defendant / Appellee:
C. SEDLER, STEVE BROWN, Vocational Welding Instructor at Sierra Conservation Center, RALPH DIAZ, Undersecretary of Operations at CDCR and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
HECTOR CLARENCE ANDERSON
(PC) Martinez v. Lewis et al
as 1:2019cv00812
Defendant:
C. Pfeiffer, J. Lewis and Scott Kernan
Plaintiff:
Ricardo Martinez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Walker v. Kernan et al
as 3:2019cv01430
Defendant:
Director Michael Stainer, Secretary Scott Kernan, Department of Corrections and others
Plaintiff:
G. Daniel Walker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Louis Arbee v. Scott Kernan, et al
as 19-16359
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LOUIS W. ARBEE
Defendant / Appellee:
SCOTT KERNAN and RONALD DAVIS
(PC) Anthony R. Turner v. Brown et al
as 4:2019cv01406
Defendant:
J. Maldonado, N. Gonzalez, D. Lopez and others
Plaintiff:
Anthony R. Turner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC) Hubbard v. Stainer et al
as 1:2019cv00601
Defendant:
Scott Kernan, T. Lee, R. Goodwin and others
Plaintiff:
Zane Hubbard
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Robert Glass v. Scott Kernan, et al
as 19-55592
Defendant / Appellee:
SCOTT KERNAN, Secretary of the Califorrnia Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, individual and official capacity and JENNIFER SHAFFER, Director of the California Board of Parole Hearings, individual and official capacity
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROBERT LATRELLE GLASS
Johnny Porras v. Scott Kernan et al
as 2:2019cv02363
Plaintiff:
Johnny Porras
Defendant:
Bill Muniz and Scott Kernan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
(PC) Hill v. Kernan et al
as 2:2019cv00512
Defendant:
D. Furtado, K. Holmes, A. Brown and others
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Hill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
