Cases 41 - 50 of 726
Marc v. Jung
as 8:2023cv00890
Plaintiff:
Lavila Marc
Defendant:
William F. Jung
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Shankin v. RPS Companies Inc. et al
as 6:2023mc00008
Plaintiff:
Lindy Shankin
Defendant:
RPS Companies Inc. and William Thomas Ficka, III
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1963 Registration of judgment from another district
Williams v. All Public Servants
as 1:2023cv20900
Plaintiff:
Octavia Horne Williams
Defendant:
All Public Servants
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
WILLIAMS v. IC SYSTEM INC
as 1:2023cv00037
Plaintiff:
TABETHA WILLIAMS
Defendant:
I.C. SYSTEM, INC. and IC SYSTEM INC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Laggner v. Milby
as 8:2023mc00007
In Re:
Application of William Laggner
Petitioner:
William Laggner
Respondent:
James D. Milby
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1782 Letter rogatory - appointment
DURR v. HARRIS & HARRIS LTD INC
as 3:2023cv02018
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM DURR
Defendant:
HARRIS & HARRIS LTD INC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
PETERS v. FC FUNDING et al
as 3:2023cv00011
Plaintiff:
JUSTIN PETERS, JR
Defendant:
FC FUNDING doing business as FLAGSHIP CREDIT ACCEPTANCE LLC, HIDE N SEEK TOWING & RECOVERY, RAP FINANCIAL LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Rose v. Cellular Touch Wireless, Inc.
as 2:2023cv00022
Plaintiff:
William Rose
Defendant:
Cellular Touch Wireless, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed Question: Fed Communications Act of 1
Vaughn v. Bankston Motor Homes Inc et al
as 5:2022cv01574
Plaintiff:
William A Vaughn
Defendant:
Bankston Motor Homes Inc and Entegra Coach
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Duke v. Tennessee Credit Management Inc
as 5:2022cv01529
Plaintiff:
William Duke
Defendant:
Tennessee Credit Management Inc a Tennessee Corporation doing business as TCM Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
