Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Wenick v. Becerra et al
as 1:2023cv02814
Plaintiff:
George D. Wenick
Defendant:
Xavier Becerra, Dr. Kilolo Kijakazi, Rose Mary Buehler and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
David E. Stone, et al v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue Service
as 22-13217
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID E. STONE, KARI S. CARROLL and DAVID DEPADRO
Defendant / Appellee:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY and COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE
Webb v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 8:2022cv02117
Plaintiff:
Isaac Webb
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 427 Social Security Benefits
Cohen v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 8:2022cv01858
Plaintiff:
Martin Cohen
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
SSA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Rodriguez de Leon v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2021cv21178
Plaintiff:
Maria E. Rodriguez de Leon
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0402
Butler v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2019cv00331
Plaintiff:
Larry J. Butler
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
SSA
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0702
Daniels v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2018cv00627
Plaintiff:
Helen Louise Daniels
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Aldo Baez v. Commissioner of Social Sec.
as 18-11952
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ALDO ROMAN BAEZ
Defendant - Appellee:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Swinnie v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 8:2018cv00407
Plaintiff:
James V. Swinnie
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0551
McPherson v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2018cv00398
Plaintiff:
Charles S. McPherson
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
