Cases 1 - 10 of 21
CRC TRANSPORT LLC v. CATERPILLER INC
as 3:2024cv00233
Plaintiff:
CRC Transport, LLC
Defendant:
Caterpillar Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Alabama Aggregate, Inc et al v. Powerscreen Crushing and Screening, LLC et al
as 2:2021cv00357
Defendant:
Terex USA, LLC., Caterpillar Inc., Dustin White and others
Plaintiff:
Donald R. Raughton, Sr. and Alabama Aggregate, Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Schwieterman v. Caterpillar Inc.
as 1:2020cv02611
Defendant:
Caterpillar Inc.
Plaintiff:
Romey Schwieterman
Petitioner:
Yancey Bros. Co.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
VIKING HOSPITALITY II, LLC v. PANTROPIC POWER, INC. et al
as 1:2020cv23660
Plaintiff:
VIKING HOSPITALITY II, LLC
Defendant:
CATERPILLAR INC. and PANTROPIC POWER, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
CGK LLC v. Pantropic Power, Inc. et al
as 0:2020cv60730
Defendant:
Caterpillar Inc. and Pantropic Power, Inc.
Plaintiff:
CGK LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333
Covone Bello v. Caterpillar, Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv22326
Defendant:
Riviera Australia Pty Ltd. and Caterpillar, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Lucio Alfonso Covone Bello
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Lucio Bello v. Caterpillar, Inc.
as 18-12489
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LUCIO ALFONSO COVONE BELLO
Defendant / Appellee:
CATERPILLAR, INC.
Lucio Bello v. Caterpillar, Inc.
as 18-12489
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LUCIO ALFONSO COVONE BELLO
Defendant - Appellee:
CATERPILLAR, INC.
:
SERVICE
Stein v. Marquis Yachts, LLC et al
as 1:2014cv24756
Plaintiff:
Robert Stein
Defendant:
Caterpillar, Inc. and Marquis Yachts, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330
Robert Stein v. Marquis Yachts, LLC, et al
as 15-12406
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT STEIN, an individual
Defendant - Appellee:
MARQUIS YACHTS, LLC, a Wisconsin limited liability company and CATERPILLAR, INC., a Illinois corporation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
