Cases 31 - 40 of 85
HERNANDEZ v. JONES
as 3:2019cv00554
Plaintiff:
ARTURO HERNNDEZ, Arturo Hernandez and KING ARTHUR
Defendant:
CHRISTOPHER JONES and Christopher Jones doing business as KING ARTHUR
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
Chanel, Inc. v. Replicachanelbag et al
as 0:2018cv62860
Defendant:
nkss520, luxurycguangz4483, alexli418 and others
Plaintiff:
Chanel, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
Dr. Colorchip Corp. v. Dr. Colourchip Canada, Inc. et al
as 9:2018cv81713
Defendant:
Dr. Colourchip Canada, Inc., William D. Mclean Jr. and Duane King
Plaintiff:
Dr. Colorchip Corp.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
Cartier International A.G. et al v. A1Marketing et al
as 0:2018cv62640
Defendant:
Melan BanBan, DongYuRong, My_TimeZone and others
Plaintiff:
Van Cleef & Arpels SA, Montblanc-Simplo GMBH, Officine Panerai A.G. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
Howarth v. Stanley
as 5:2018cv01158
Defendant:
Dustin Stanley and Dustin Stanley doing business as Alabama Pool Kings
Plaintiff:
Morgan Howarth
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Fecon, Inc. v. King Kong Tools, LLC
as 1:2018cv01843
Plaintiff:
Fecon, Inc.
Defendant:
King Kong Tools, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338
Z. Sasson v. Beard King Corp.
as 1:2017cv24445
Plaintiff:
Z. Sasson
Defendant:
Beard King Corp
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Fronto King, LLC v. Five A Trading, Inc.
as 17-15012
Plaintiff - Appellee:
FRONTO KING, LLC
Defendant - Appellant:
FIVE A TRADING, INC., d.b.a. A to Z Wholesale
ABERCROMBIE & FITCH TRADING CO. v. Alicia Watsonter et al
as 0:2017cv61134
Plaintiff:
ABERCROMBIE & FITCH TRADING CO.
Defendant:
Alicia Watsonter, Antonia Broderick, Arthurvaughan and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
Breitling U.S.A. Inc. v. 3C electronic et al
as 0:2017cv60519
Defendant:
3C electronic, hangzhou Q one, ShenzhenBaba Network Technology Ltd. and others
Plaintiff:
Breitling U.S.A. Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1127
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
