Cases 121 - 130 of 37,436
Neeley v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2024cv00084
Plaintiff:
Lynn L. Neeley
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Metler Tonnessen v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 9:2024cv80578
Plaintiff:
Autumn Metler Tonnessen
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley, Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Bermudez v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 8:2024cv01066
Plaintiff:
Minerva Bermudez
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
Edwards v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv00272
Plaintiff:
Javaughn Edwards
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Curry v. Commissioner, Social Security Administration
as 1:2024cv01939
Plaintiff:
Jason M Curry
Defendant:
Commissioner, Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
Christina Heffner v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 24-11419
Plaintiff:
CHRISTINA HEFFNER
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Hill v. Commissioner, Social Security Administration
as 1:2024cv01941
Plaintiff:
Bernard Antoion Hill
Defendant:
Commissioner, Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
Williams v. Social Security Administration, Commissioner
as 2:2024cv00555
Plaintiff:
Cathy M Williams
Defendant:
Social Security Administration, Commissioner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
McCarthy vs Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2024cv00432
Plaintiff:
Ms. Gina Kay McCarthy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402 Social Security Benefits
ROMANICK v. O'MALLEY
as 3:2024cv00194
Plaintiff:
PAUL SHANE ROMANICK
Defendant:
MARTIN O'MALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
