Cases 141 - 149 of 149
Taylor v Commissioner, Social Security Administration
as 5:2007cv01549
Plaintiff:
Melissa B. Taylor and Melissa B. Taylor
Defendant:
Commissioner, Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
TAYLOR v. ASTRUE
as 3:2007cv00343
Plaintiff:
ELLA E TAYLOR
Defendant:
MICHAEL J ASTRUE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Taylor v. Astrue
as 3:2007cv00076
Plaintiff:
Marilyn Taylor
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Taylor v. Astrue
as 5:2007cv00272
Plaintiff:
Nikita W. Taylor
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383 Review of HHS Decision
Taylor v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 6:2007cv01023
Plaintiff:
Robert E. Taylor and Robert E. Taylor
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Taylor v. Commissioner, Social Security Administration
as 5:2007cv00544
Plaintiff:
Mon Dee Taylor
Defendant:
Commissioner, Social Security Administration and Commissioner, Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Taylor v. Social Security Administration, Commissioner
as 7:2007cv00333
Plaintiff:
Katherine J. Taylor
Defendant:
Social Security Administration, Commissioner and Social Security Administration, Commissioner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
TAYLOR v. BARNHART
as 4:2007cv00018
Plaintiff:
ERICA D TAYLOR
Defendant:
MICHAEL J ASTRUE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Taylor v. Social Security Administration, Commissioner
as 6:2007cv00111
Plaintiff:
James S Taylor
Defendant:
Social Security Administration, Commissioner and Social Security Administration, Commissioner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
