Cases 11 - 20 of 180
Jarrell v. Acting Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2022cv00074
Plaintiff:
Tammi Sierra Jarrell
Defendant:
Acting Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Howard v. Social Security Administration, Commissioner
as 2:2022cv00433
Plaintiff:
Tammy Howard
Defendant:
Social Security Administration, Commissioner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Canty v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 8:2021cv02387
Plaintiff:
Tammy Canty
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Holder-Hillman v. Kijakazi
as 1:2021cv03381
Plaintiff:
Tammy Carvette Holder-Hillman
Defendant:
Commissioner, Social Security Administration and Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Hill v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 8:2021cv01788
Plaintiff:
Tammy Hill
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Ohneck v. Social Security Administration, Commissioner
as 4:2021cv00962
Plaintiff:
Tammy Ohneck
Defendant:
Social Security Administration, Commissioner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Tompkins v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 8:2021cv01600
Plaintiff:
Tammy Tompkins
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
HOBBS v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 5:2021cv00164
Defendant:
ANDREW SAUL and COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Plaintiff:
Tammy Hobbs
Not Classified By Court:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION (NOTICE)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416
Kincey v. Saul (CONSENT)
as 1:2021cv00224
Defendant:
Andrew Saul
Plaintiff:
Tammy Kincey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Bartlett v. Saul
as 4:2021cv00067
Defendant:
Andrew Saul
Plaintiff:
Tammy Bartlett
Not Classified By Court:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
