Cases 1 - 10 of 269
Rodriguez v. O'Malley, Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2024cv00651
Plaintiff:
Dennisse Lydia Rodriguez
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley, Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
Hill v. O'Malley
as 2:2024cv00371
Plaintiff:
Patrice Van Hill
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
WILLIAMS v. OMALLEY
as 3:2024cv00294
Plaintiff:
KRYSTALYN R WILLIAMS
Defendant:
MARTIN OMALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Smith v. O'Malley
as 8:2024cv01515
Plaintiff:
April Smith
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Interested Party:
SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
MELENDEZ v. O'MALLEY
as 1:2024cv00103
Plaintiff:
Angelea J Melendez
Defendant:
MARTIN O'MALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Chesal v. O'Malley
as 0:2024cv61087
Plaintiff:
Tina Chesal
Defendant:
Martin J O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Smith v. O'Malley
as 4:2024cv00079
Plaintiff:
Antonio Smith
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration and United States Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Georgia
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Romero v. O'Malley, Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv21532
Plaintiff:
Juliana Romero
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley, Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Taylor v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv00203
Plaintiff:
Shirlie Taylor
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Pepper v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv00367
Plaintiff:
Joseph Pepper
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
