Cases 1 - 10 of 29
McDonald v. O'Malley
as 6:2024cv00406
Plaintiff:
Gregory McDonald
Defendant:
Martin J O'Malley
Interested Party:
SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
McDonald v. Commissioner, Social Security Administration
as 2:2023cv00189
Plaintiff:
Amber Michelle McDonald
Defendant:
Commissioner, Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
McDonald v. Kijakazi
as 1:2023cv00381
Plaintiff:
Willie McDonald
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
McDonald v. Commissioner, Social Security Administration
as 1:2023cv00453
Plaintiff:
Nekisha Marie McDonald
Defendant:
Commissioner, Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
McDonald v. Saul
as 1:2020cv00577
Defendant:
Andrew M. Saul
Plaintiff:
Robert Earl McDonald
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
McDonald v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 5:2020cv00222
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff:
Christine McDonald
Interested Party:
SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416
McDonald Robinson v. Saul
as 0:2020cv60564
Defendant:
Saul and Andrew M. Saul
Plaintiff:
McDonald Robinson and Gerald McDonald Robinson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0416
McDonald v. Commissioner, Social Security Administration
as 2:2020cv00044
Defendant:
Commissioner, Social Security Administration
Plaintiff:
Amber Michelle McDonald
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
McDonald v. Andrew Saul
as 1:2020cv00391
Plaintiff:
Tara McDonald
Defendant:
Andrew Saul and Social Security Regional Administrator - NEF Only
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
McDonald v. Commissioner Social Security
as 6:2019cv00642
Plaintiff:
LeaAnn McDonald
Defendant:
Commissioner Social Security and Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
