Cases 11 - 20 of 90
Jason Jensen v. Baycare Behavioral Health, Inc, et al
as 21-11734
Defendant / Appellee:
SCOTT RIVKEES, JANE DOE #1, JOHN DOES 1-3 and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JASON ADAM JENSEN
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 9:2021cv80896
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
Doe #1 et al v. MG Freesites LTD et al
as 7:2021cv00220
Defendant:
9219-1568 Quebec Inc a foreign entity doing business as Mindgeek, Mindgeek USA Incorporated, MG Freesites II LTD and others
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Film Connx LLC v. John and/or Jane Does 1-10
as 1:2020cv05029
Plaintiff:
Film Connx LLC
Defendant:
John and/or Jane Does 1-10
Margaret Helton v. Steak N Shake, Inc., et al
as 20-14549
Defendant / Appellee:
JOHN/JANE DOES (1-3), ABC CORPORATIONS (1-3) and STEAK N SHAKE, INC.
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MARGARET HELTON
Jane Doe #1 v. Wyndham Hotels & Resorts, Inc., et al
as 20-90004
Respondent:
MICROTEL INN & SUITES FRANCHISING, INC., WYNDHAM HOTELS & RESORTS INC and CHOICE HOTELS INTERNATIONAL, INC.
Petitioner:
JANE DOE #1
Jane Doe #1 v. Choice Hotels International, et al
as 20-11764
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JANE DOE #1
Defendant / Appellee:
WYNDHAM HOTELS & RESORTS INC, CHOICE HOTELS INTERNATIONAL, INC. and MICROTEL INNS AND SUITES FRANCHISING, INC.
Not Classified By Court:
SERVICE
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 9:2019cv81568
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Kerley v. Hatch et al
as 1:2019mi00139
Defendant:
Torence Hatch, Larry Anderson, XYZ Companies 1-10 and others
Plaintiff:
Glen Kerley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1963
Gibson-Hawley v. USA Management LLC et al
as 1:2019mi00104
Plaintiff:
Tiffany Gibson-Hawley
Defendant:
Jane Does 1-10, John Does 1-10, Troy Legg and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1963
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
