Cases 11 - 20 of 162
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00864
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00352
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv14156
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Powell v. Genesco, Inc
as 0:2023cv61012
Plaintiff:
Kristen Powell
Defendant:
Genesco, Inc and Genesco, Inc doing business as JOURNEYS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Penning v. Global Processing Services, LLC et al
as 3:2023mc00008
Plaintiff:
Matthew Penning
Defendant:
Global Processing Services, LLC, Premier Recovery Solutions, LLC, Premier Debt Portfolios, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1963 Registration of judgment from another district
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2023cv00405
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Powell v. Railroad Retirement Board (MAG+)
as 3:2023cv00026
Plaintiff:
David Powell
Defendant:
Railroad Retirement Board
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 231 Railroad Retirement Act of 1974
USA v. Clayton Powell
as 22-14262
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
CLAYTON EUGENE POWELL
Powell v. Michaels Stores, Inc
as 0:2022cv62097
Plaintiff:
Kristen Powell
Defendant:
Michaels Stores, Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Wright et al v. Department of Veterans Affairs et al
as 1:2022cv04345
Plaintiff:
Bridget Wright and Laquita Smith
Defendant:
Department of Veterans Affairs, Manju Cibi RN and Choreen Powell RN
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
