Cases 21 - 30 of 76
Kendrick et al v. Apple Inc
as 4:2021cv00976
Plaintiff:
Kim Kendrick, Brianna Kruz Smith, Cassandra White and others
Defendant:
Apple Inc
Henry Barnes v. Valdosta Georgia, et al
as 21-11756
Defendant / Appellee:
MARK BURKHART, Police Officer/Off Duty Security Officer, CARLA JONES, Police Officer/Off Duty Security Officer, VALDOSTA GEORGIA, City of and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
HENRY BARNES
Wiand v. Adamek et al
as 8:2021cv00360
Defendant:
Stephen Cooper, Cynthia Duckett, Kathryn Shively and others
Plaintiff:
Burton W. Wiand
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 754 Receiver of Property in Different Districts
Hahn et al v. Deutsche Bank National Trust Company
as 8:2021cv00039
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey M. Hahn and Carla Turner-Hahn
Defendant:
Deutsche Bank National Trust Company
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2020cv01395
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Michael Earle, et al v. Birmingham Board of Education, et al
as 20-10763
Defendant / Appellee:
LISA HERRING, in her official and individual capacity as Superintendent of the Birmingham City Schools and BIRMINGHAM BOARD OF EDUCATION
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CARLA EVANS and MICHAEL F. EARLE
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv00026
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Juvenal Camargo, et al v. Chiquita Brands International,, et al
as 19-14692
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JUVENAL ENRIQUE FONTALV CAMARGO and NANCY MORA LEMUS
Defendant / Appellee:
WILLIAM TSACALIS, ROBERT OLSON, CYRUS FREIDHEIM and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2019cv00315
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv00744
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
