Cases 31 - 39 of 39
Adell et al v. Macon County Greyhound Park, Inc. et al
as 3:2010cv00122
Plaintiff:
All Plaintiffs, All Plaintiffs, All Plaintiffs and others
Defendant:
Macon County Greyhound Park, Inc., Milton E. McGregor, Multimedia Games, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Henderson v. Conway et al
as 1:2009cv03536
Plaintiff:
Anthony Henderson
Defendant:
R. L (Butch) Conway, Melodie Snell Conner and Robert W. Mitchum
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Type:
Other Statutes
Henderson v. Conway et al
as 1:2009mi00510
Plaintiff:
Anthony Henderson
Defendant:
R. L (Butch) Conway, Melodie Snell Conner and Robert W. Mitchum
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Type:
Other Statutes
Abraham et al v. ConAgra Foods, Inc.
as 1:2009cv02844
Plaintiff:
Kimberly Abraham, Keith Abraham, Yolanda Aguirre and others
Defendant:
ConAgra Foods, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Type:
Other Statutes
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv02738
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (other)
Type:
Other Statutes
HALL v. 84 LUMBER COMPANY et al
as 1:2009mc00028
Plaintiff:
CHARLES D HALL, SR
Defendant:
84 LUMBER COMPANY, DARREN RICHARDSON and KEITH CONNER
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2009cv00723
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Securitypoint Media, LLC v. The Adason Group, LLC et al
as 1:2008mi00177
Plaintiff:
Securitypoint Media, LLC
Defendant:
The Adason Group, LLC, The Conner Group and Stephen Conner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1963 Registration of judgment from another district
Auburn Medical Ctr. v. Moore, et al
as 2:2003cv01225
Plaintiff:
Auburn Medical Center, Inc.
Defendant:
Gorman Houston , Harold See , Champ Lyons, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
