Cases 31 - 40 of 86
Lechter et al v. Aprio, LLP et al
as 1:2020cv01325
Defendant:
Aprio, LLP, James Jowers, Robert Greenberger and others
Plaintiff:
Russell Dalba, Kathryn Dalba, Sylvia Thompson and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
In re: Van Williams
as 20-10284
Petitioner:
In re: VAN LAWSON WILLIAMS
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Dario Rodriguez v. Alan Lawson, et al
as 20-10181
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DARIO M. RODRIGUEZ
Defendant / Appellee:
JAMES C. MAHEN, District Judge, ALBERTO GONZALEZ, Attorney General, ALAN LAWSON, Supervisor, Supreme Court and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2019cv00200
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv03910
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
USA v. Edward Lawson
as 19-13284
Defendant / Appellant:
EDWARD MALONE LAWSON
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Royal Palm Village Residents, Inc., et al v. Slider et al
as 8:2019cv00874
Defendant:
Royal Palm Village, LLC, Sun Communities, Inc., Belinda Lawson and others
Plaintiff:
Royal Palm Village Residents, Inc., Laurie Skemp, James LeMonnier and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2019cv00159
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Shkelzen Berisha v. Guy Lawson, et al
as 19-10315
Other:
SERVICE
Defendant / Appellee:
SIMON & SCHUSTER, INC., RECORDED BOOKS, INC., ALEXANDER PODRIZKI and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SHKELZEN BERISHA
Lawson v. Pivotal Payments Inc
as 2:2019cv00122
Plaintiff:
Nathaniel C Lawson
Defendant:
Pivotal Payments Inc and Pivotal Payments Inc doing business as Capital Processing Network and CPN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
