Cases 41 - 50 of 321
Almyr Guimaraes v. Beatrice Butchko, et al
as 22-10697
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ALMYR GUIMARAES
Defendant / Appellee:
BEATRICE BUTCHKO, MICHAEL A. HANZAN, TROMBERG MORRIS & POULIN PLLC and others
Guimaraes v. Butchko et al
as 1:2022cv20033
Plaintiff:
Almyr Guimaraes
Defendant:
Beatrice Butchko, Michael A. Hanzan, Tromberg, Morris & Poulin Law Firm and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Hoover et al v. Strategic Capital Partners, LLC et al
as 1:2021cv01299
Defendant:
Georgia-Alabama Land Trust, Inc., James Freeman, Bridge Capital Associates, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
C. Jackson Hoover, Edward William Spratt, Heather Greiner and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
USA v. Marvin Carridice
as 22-10070
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
MARVIN MORRIS CARRIDICE
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2021cv00397
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2021cv00550
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Healthier Choices Management Corp. v. Philip Morris USA, Inc., et al
as 21-14422
Plaintiff / Appellant:
HEALTHIER CHOICES MANAGEMENT CORP.
Defendant / Appellee:
PHILIP MORRIS USA, INC. and PHILIP MORRIS PRODUCTS S.A.
Dominic DiMaio v. Williams, et al
as 21-14020
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DOMINIC ALAN DIMAIO
Defendant / Appellee:
WILLIAMS, JSO Dept. of Corrections and MORRIS, J.S.O. Dept. of Corrections
Freddie Seltzer v. Morris-Shea Bridge Company, Inc., et al
as 21-13764
Plaintiff / Appellant:
FREDDIE SELTZER, CHESTER COLEMAN and LARRY COLEMAN
Defendant / Appellee:
MORRIS-SHEA BRIDGE COMPANY, INC. and RICHARD SHEA
Gates et al v. Apple, Inc.
as 6:2021cv01386
Plaintiff:
Gates, Teresa Gates, Angela Irvin and others
Defendant:
Apple, Inc. and Apple Inc
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
