Cases 41 - 50 of 230
Jehu Ramirez v. Secretary, Florida Department, et al
as 20-13692
Respondent / Appellee:
SECRETARY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA
Petitioner / Appellant:
JEHU RAMIREZ
Jose Ramirez, et al v. Statewide Harvesting & Hauling
as 20-11995
Defendant / Appellant:
STATEWIDE HARVESTING & HAULING, LLC
Plaintiff / Appellee:
JOEL SANTANA, all those similarly situated and JOSE RAMIREZ, all those similarly situated
Ramirez v. Ortiz
as 1:2020cv02128
Plaintiff:
Araceli Martinez Ramirez
Defendant:
Alejandro Carbajal Ortiz
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 11601
Miguel Barrera Ramirez v. U.S. Attorney General
as 20-12507
Petitioner:
MIGUEL BARRERA RAMIREZ
Respondent:
U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL
Sanchez Ramirez v. Attorney General of the United States et al
as 1:2020cv22545
Defendant:
KENNETH CUCCINELLI II, male, Chad F. Wolf, Linda M. Swacina and others
Plaintiff:
Juan Carlos Sanchez Ramirez
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0551
Ares Ramirez-Morales v. U.S. Attorney General
as 20-12469
Respondent:
U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL
Petitioner:
ARES RAMIREZ-MORALES
Brizo, LLC, As Owner v. Urieli Carbajal, et al
as 20-11204
Defendant / Appellant:
ROSALIA GORGONIO IXBA and URIELI RAMIREZ CARBAJAL
Plaintiff / Appellee:
BRIZO, LLC, AS OWNER OF THE M/V HONEY, 2007 163 FOOT TWIN ENGINE YACHT (ON 739735)
Defendant / Appellee:
OLD PORT COVE PROPERTY OWNERS ASSOCIATION, INC.
Not Classified By Court:
SERVICE
Ramirez v. Equifax Information Services LLC
as 8:2020cv00298
Defendant:
Equifax Information Services LLC and Equifax Information Services, LLC
Plaintiff:
Johnathan Ramirez
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
USA v. Francisco Ramirez
as 20-10564
Defendant / Appellant:
FRANCISCO JOSEPH ARCILA RAMIREZ
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Ledis Sandoval-Ramirez v. U.S. Attorney General
as 20-10432
Petitioner:
LEDIS VIRGINIA SANDOVAL-RAMIREZ
Respondent:
U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
