Cases 81 - 90 of 167
Robinson v. Region Bank, N.A. et al
as 8:2016mc00025
Plaintiff:
Kira B. Robinson
Defendant:
Region Bank, N.A. and AmSouth Bank
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv04011
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Harrington et al v. Regions Bank
as 2:2015cv00522
Plaintiff:
Larry Harrington and Lori Harrington
Defendant:
Regions Bank
Cause Of Action: Restrictions on Use of Telephone Equipment
United States of America v. Pettus
as 2:2015mc03708
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Clifton Pettus
Garnishee:
Regions Bank
Cause Of Action: Application for a Writ of Garnishment
Gullo et al v. Pollack & Rosen, P.A. et al
as 6:2015cv00669
Plaintiff:
Robert K. Gullo and Laurie A. Gullo
Defendant:
Pollack & Rosen, P.A. and Regions Bank
Cause Of Action: Restrictions on Use of Telephone Equipment
Gullo et al v. Pollack & Rosen, P.A. et al
as 8:2015cv01025
Plaintiff:
Robert K. Gullo and Laurie A. Gullo
Defendant:
Pollack & Rosen, P.A. and Regions Bank
Cause Of Action: Restrictions on Use of Telephone Equipment
Poulos et al v. Waller et al
as 8:2015cv00888
Defendant:
Waller & Mitchell, P.A., George Malacos, Lynne Gilbert and others
Plaintiff:
Basilios Poulos, Georgia Poulos, Anastasios Poulos and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
Regions Bank v. Bing Charles Kearney, Jr.
as 15-11296
Plaintiff - Appellee:
REGIONS BANK, an Alabama state chartered bank, as successor in interest to AmSouth Bank
Defendant - Appellant:
BING CHARLES W. KEARNEY, JR.
Regions Bank v. Bing Charles Kearney, Jr.
as 15-11102
Plaintiff - Appellee:
REGIONS BANK, an Alabama state chartered bank, as successor in interest to AmSouth Bank
Defendant - Appellant:
BING CHARLES W. KEARNEY, JR.
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2015cv00542
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
